Why Didn’t the Atlanta Braves Win More World Series Titles in the 1990s?

Former Braves general manager John Schuerholz on Sunday was voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.  He joins former Braves manager Bobby Cox and pitchers Tom Glavine, John Smoltz and Greg Maddux.  Chipper Jones will most likely join them in 2018.  The common thread here is that all six participated in the Braves’ amazing run during the 1990s.  So the Braves now have from that era their general manager, manager, and three starting pitchers in the Hall, with their third baseman soon to follow.  The Braves, in the 1990s, won eight consecutive division titles, five national league pennants but only one World Series.  How is this possible? Let’s look at some theories behind the Braves’ failure to bring home more titles.

Leo Mazzone blames the lack of World Series titles on the extra round of playoffs added in 1995.  In his book Tales from the Braves Mound (Sports Publishing LLC, 2003, p. 74), Mazzone makes his case:

“The only time I felt anxiety is in that first round of the best-of-five.  In a

seven-game series, we’ve always felt that the depth of our starting rotation

and the depth of our pitching staff and the depth of our ball club could beat

anybody.  You go best-of-five and you lose one, there’s a sense of urgency.

You’re scrambling already.  One pitcher gets hot, one bad hop, one crazy thing

happens and before you know it, you’re scrambling.  That’s the only reason why

the Atlanta Braves have won only one World Series.  I guarantee we would have

won more World Series if we were winning our division, then going straight to

the NLCS.”

 

I respect Mazzone’s argument but that does not explain World Series losses to the Minnesota Twins in 1991 and the Toronto Blue Jays in 1992.  Remember the best-of-five first round playoffs did not begin until 1995.  However, maybe they would not have lost to the Florida Marlins in 1997 and the San Diego Padres in 1998 and would have gone on to win the World Series in those years.

John Smoltz is his book John Smoltz Starting and Closing (William Morrow, 2012, p. 220-229) offers several theories on why the Braves did not win more titles.  First, he claims that power pitching wins in the playoffs.  While finesse pitchers Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine were great pitchers, they pitched to contact.  They wanted hitters to hit the ball to their infielders and outfielders.  Smoltz states that this philosophy works well over the course of a 162-game regular season, but facing good hitters in the playoffs translates to more hits and more runs.  On the other hand, a power pitcher such as Smoltz can generate more strike outs thereby keeping more hitters off of the base paths and less runs from scoring.  There may be some truth in this theory.  Maddux had an 11-13 postseason record with a 2.81 ERA with the Braves and allowed an alarming 18 earned runs in 27 starts. Glavine had a 12-15 postseason record with the Braves while compiling an ERA of 3.44.  Smoltz’s postseason record with the Braves was 15-4 with an ERA of about 2.70.

The Braves played a total of 29 games in their five World Series in the 1990s.  Seventeen of those games were decided by one run and the Braves lost 12 out of 17.  All the losses to Toronto in the 1992 Series were by one run.  Fewer base runners would have meant fewer runs and maybe more wins for the Braves.  Another power pitcher may have helped.

Smoltz also points to the lack of timely hitting by the Braves in these losses and the preponderance of timely hitting from their opponents.  He argues that sound pitching and timely hitting win titles.  Hard to argue with that logic.  Oh what a timely hit in Game 7 against Minnesota would have meant to the outcome of that game and the Series.  Interestingly, Marquis Grissom had a reputation for timely hits throughout his career and he was arguably the catalyst behind the 1995 title against the Cleveland Indians.  He also hit .444 against the New York Yankees in the 1996 Series, but weird things happened in that Series (See below).

Smoltz offers one more reason for the lack of titles in Atlanta.  He argues that the Braves experienced some bad luck that decided several games and eventually cost Atlanta an extra title or two.  For example, if Lonnie Smith picks up the ball while running the bases in Game 7 against Minnesota, or at least watched his third base coach, he would not have slowed down and would have scored easily.  Maybe if the Braves had the extra home game instead of Minnesota, Atlanta wins the 1991 World Series.  Remember, the home team did not lose in 1991.  Also, if umpire Time Welke does not interfere with Jermaine Dye’s attempt to catch a very catchable foul ball during the sixth inning of that fateful Game 4 of the 1996 Series, then Derek Jeter would have been out.  Instead he singles on a later pitch and begins a three-run rally to cut Atlanta’s lead to 6-3.  The next inning, usually dependable Rafael Belliard boots a sure double-play grounder and only gets one out.  So instead of one on and two outs, there were two on and one out when Jim Leyritz launches his home run to tie the game.  The Braves would lose that game in extra innings and eventually the Series.  Again, Smoltz may have an argument here.

I have a little different take on why the Braves could not produce more titles and it revolves around John Schuerholz.  I concur with Smoltz that the Braves could have used another power pitcher and more contact hitters.  During the 1990s run the Braves were built on the long ball.  Fred McGriff, Ryan Klesko, David Justice and Javy Lopez were power hitters.  All played major roles in Atlanta’s ability to get to the World Series, but other than the 1995 Series, these players did little with their bats in other Series.  However, Mark Lemke, a contact hitter, did his part to win the 1991 Series when he batted .417 and hit .273 against Cleveland in 1995.  Unfortunately, he didn’t hit well against Toronto in 1992 and the Yankees in 1996.  Marquis Grissom, another contact hitter, batted .360 against Cleveland and .444 against the Yankees, then Schuerholz traded him to Cleveland. Grissom would lead the Indians to the 1997 World Series where he would extend his hitting streak in World Series games to 15.  The Braves did receive Kenny Lofton as part of that trade, but Lofton played one year with Atlanta before returning to Cleveland as a free agent. Another contact hitter or two may have changed the outcomes of some of the games against elite opponents in the World Series, where hits are generally at a premium because of the strong pitchers associated with each club.  Grissom brought the added dimension of speed, which enables clubs to manufacture runs more easily.  Just look at what Kenny Lofton did to the Braves in 1995 and may have done with Atlanta Braves if the Braves had elected to re-sign him after the 1997 season.

So had the Braves acquired another power pitcher or two or another contact hitter or two or someone besides Grissom who could manufacture a run with his bat and legs, would that have possibly allowed the Braves to win more of those one-run games and change the total of their World Series titles?  Maybe, but we will never know because the man responsible for acquiring such pieces, John Schuerholz, did not do so.  I am not laying the lack of more titles completely at his feet because I don’t know what he was or was not told to do by upper management.  However, Ted Turner owned the Braves for most of this run and I have to believe if Schuerholz requested that the Braves add one or more aforementioned pieces Turner would have agreed to do so. I don’t believe money really was an issue back then.

You can make your own judgments.  Maybe the Braves needed another power pitcher, or contact hitter, or base stealer.  Maybe they were just unlucky.  Or maybe, some other factor(s) played a role in the lack of titles that have not come to mind.  I really don’t know, but I give much of the blame to John Schuerholz, the man just elected into the Baseball Hall of Fame.  One thing I am sure of—the Atlanta Braves should have more than one World Series title.

 

 

For the Braves: 1988 and 2016, Brothers From a Different Mother?

250px-Atlanta_Braves_Insignia.svg

The 2016 Atlanta Braves are off to a 0-8 start as of April 14 and the projection for the rest of the season does not look promising.  Offensively, the Braves have averaged 2.75 runs per game, second worst in the National League behind the Mets’ 2.50; their team batting average is a paltry .199, again second worst behind the Mets’ .194; and team has managed to send three balls out of the ball park, which ties them for second worst with Pittsburgh and ahead of the Mets’ by one.  I know what you are thinking at this point, “Well, Pittsburgh and the Mets were playoff teams last year and the Mets went to the World Series.”  True.  However, I believe Pittsburgh and the Mets will improve their offensive numbers.  As for the Braves…here are some more statistics.  The team Earned Run Average is 5.79, second worst behind Colorado’s 7.61.  The Braves have zero saves, tied with Cincinnati for last.  However, Cincinnati is 5-3.  So, I believe we can say that the 2016 Braves can’t hit, score runs or pitch.  Of course, these statistics could improve as the season progresses, but don’t hold your breath.  Rarely does a team lose less than 54 games, but these Braves just may accomplish that ignominious feat.  Also, the bells may be tolling for manager Fredi Gonzalez.

The 2016 version of the Braves compares very nicely with the 1988 team.  That squad started the season 0-10 and finished in last place in the National League West 39.5 games behind first place Los Angeles and 27 games behind next to last Houston. These Braves could not hit, score runs or pitch either.  The 1988 team finished last in the National League in ERA and Saves.  It finished last in runs per games, next to last in batting average, and tied for third to last in home runs hit.  Oh, and these Braves finished with a 54-106 record.  About 40 games into the season, general manager Bobby Cox fired manager Chuck Tanner and replaced him with Russ Nixon, whom Cox replaced as manager in June 1990.

These two Braves teams may have some very positive similarities, though.  The 1988 team witnessed two future Hall of Famers take the mound:  Tom Glavine and John Smoltz.  Glavine compiled a 7-17 record in his first full season with the Braves, while Smoltz debuted in July.  Young infielders Jeff Blauser and Mark Lemke made the team but did not play much.  These four young Braves would form the nucleus of the 1990s dynasty teams along with 1988 first round pick Steve Avery.

For the 2016 Braves, young pitcher Matt Wisler will be throwing in his first full season, while young prospects Tyrell Jenkins and Mike Foltynewicz are ready at any time to be called up from the minor leagues. Middle infielders Dansby Swanson and Ozzie Albies, while probably a season away, could make it to the big leagues before season’s end.  These young players may form the core of what Braves officials hope will be a second dynasty.

The 1988 and 2016 Atlanta Braves have many similarities.  Certainly, the 1988 squad had young players that would form the foundation of the 1990s World Series teams, but it took three more years before playoffs and World Series would be the norm.  Assuming that the 2016 team sees more of the organization’s young talent grabbing spots on the major league roster, maybe we can point to 2019 as the beginning of the second Braves dynasty.  Therein lies the hope for Atlanta Braves fans. As for the 2016 team:   0-8 and counting!  Oh, brother!

 

This Day in Braves History–April 7

On this date in 1963, a public stock offering of 115,000 shares in the Milwaukee Braves is withdrawn after only 13,000 shares are sold to 1,600 new investors. The Braves would leave Milwaukee after the 1965 season for Atlanta.

In 1979, Houston Astros pitcher Ken Forsch no-hit the Braves, 6-0. The 1970’s witnessed some of the worst Braves teams ever.